Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
mesh [2017/07/18 09:39]
fgillet [Mesh Adaptation]
mesh [2017/07/18 09:39] (current)
fgillet [Mesh Adaptation]
Line 29: Line 29:
 Here, we use an error estimate based on the interpolation error, proposed by Frey and Alauzet (2005). Routines to compute the anisotropic metric defining the mesh size have been implemented as Elmer/Ice Solvers. The mesh adaptation is performed using the freely available library MMG ([[http://​www.mmgtools.org]],​ Dapogny et al., 2014).  ​ Here, we use an error estimate based on the interpolation error, proposed by Frey and Alauzet (2005). Routines to compute the anisotropic metric defining the mesh size have been implemented as Elmer/Ice Solvers. The mesh adaptation is performed using the freely available library MMG ([[http://​www.mmgtools.org]],​ Dapogny et al., 2014).  ​
  
-Our implementation is actually restricted to the adaptation of plane-view 2D meshes comprised of linear 3-nodes triangular elements. This procedure was previously performed using external codes and the remeshing software Yams.  The mesh adaptation features are documented [[mesh:​meshadaptation|here]]+Our implementation is actually restricted to the adaptation of plane-view 2D meshes comprised of linear 3-nodes triangular elements. This procedure was previously performed using external codes and the remeshing software Yams.  The mesh adaptation features are documented [[mesh:​meshadaptation|here]].
mesh.txt ยท Last modified: 2017/07/18 09:39 by fgillet
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0