Hi everyone,
I have a small problem computing viewfactors in an axi symmetric modell. When I use 2D cartesian coordinates everything works as expected. When I change the coordinate system to axi symmetric, all the view factors a zero.
Is there a reason for this behavior?
Best,
carsten
Search found 37 matches
- 03 Nov 2012, 21:06
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Viewfactor computation in axi symmetric modell
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2162
- 03 Nov 2012, 19:04
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Difference between cylindrical symmetric and axi symmetric
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2435
Difference between cylindrical symmetric and axi symmetric
Hello,
Elmer offers the possibility to use cylindrical as well as axi symmetric coordinate systems.
What is the difference between both?
Cheers,
carsten
Elmer offers the possibility to use cylindrical as well as axi symmetric coordinate systems.
What is the difference between both?
Cheers,
carsten
- 03 Nov 2012, 19:01
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Viewfactor Computation for Elmer
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2002
Viewfactor Computation for Elmer
Hello, I am currently using Elmer for thermal simulations of bodies in close proximity at high temperatures with open surroundings. The basic mechanism for coupling of the different bodies is radiation. I performed several simulations in 2D and the results are very promising. Unfortunately, the resu...
- 19 Oct 2012, 11:50
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3977
Re: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
Hi Cesar, Hi Peter, the advice to omit the newton iteration did the trick, the simulation did converge (but I am a little confused since I thought until now that the newton-rhapson method has better convergence properties than the picard iteration). The structure with the cylinders was just a test c...
- 18 Oct 2012, 17:06
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3977
Re: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
Ok, I modeled the same setup with every volume body as seperate group and every surface as distinct boundary group an I still get the same strange behavior of NaN in the fourth itteration.
Any other suggestions?
Best!
Any other suggestions?
Best!
- 18 Oct 2012, 12:12
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3977
Re: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
Hi mzenker,
thanks for trying
I modeled all cylinders as one body since I only have one material and one boundary condition so I guess this should work.
Cheers,
Carsten
thanks for trying
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Cheers,
Carsten
- 18 Oct 2012, 00:16
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3977
Possible Bug in Elmer Heat Solver with Radiation BC
Hello everyone, I tried modeling the thermal coupling of several bodys in vacuum in Elmer. I started rather simple with a few cylinder with high thermal conductivity, internal heat source (body force) and diffuse radiation boundary conditions. The simulation works in principle quiet well unless I pl...