Search found 6 matches

by rimple_sandhu
30 Nov 2016, 21:42
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: How to define an Orthotropic plate
Replies: 2
Views: 2775

How to define an Orthotropic plate

Hello guys: I am a newbie to Elmer and I am trying to model an aircraft wing using the linear plate solver. The wing (a cantilever beam) is orthotropic and has E_1, E_2, G, mu parameters given for it. However, I am unable to assign those values as the plate solver allows for to assign only E_1 and m...
by rimple_sandhu
02 Nov 2016, 21:42
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: What is "displacement n load"?
Replies: 7
Views: 7289

Re: What is "displacement n load"?

Hi Peter, I am indeed using this functionality to couple a Emer CSD code with a CFD solver, where I obtain the nodal forces for structural boundary nodes from the CFD solver. I use the following boundary condition in Elmer sif file to impose the nodal loads obtained from CFD solver: Boundary Conditi...
by rimple_sandhu
13 Sep 2016, 06:26
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Missing acceleration when restart from existing solution
Replies: 7
Views: 5777

Re: Missing acceleration when restart from existing solution

Thanks peter. It works now. I just want to know what was changed in the source code. Is it that you now save displacements from several of previous iterations, or you use different time-descritization strategy for 2nd order PDEs. Also, with this implementation, I don't think we need to use 'Calculat...
by rimple_sandhu
30 Aug 2016, 11:18
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: How to create restart files
Replies: 12
Views: 13933

Re: How to create restart files

Any luck? I am facing the same issue. I think we need a way to communicate the acceleration info from previous time-step to resolve the issue?

Stan, were u able get hold of the issue?

Regards,
Rimple
by rimple_sandhu
30 Aug 2016, 11:13
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Missing acceleration when restart from existing solution
Replies: 7
Views: 5777

Re: Missing acceleration when restart from existing solution

I am facing the same issue. I am getting numerical damping and bias in frequency when restarting the transient simulation at each time step, when compared to the response obtained without stopping. Did some one found the solution to this issue?