Elmer Discussion Forum

Hi Cedric, Maybe you could check to remove the SaveScalars instances that give correct solution and check whether the problematic instances still give wrong answers. Or do the result depend on which order the instances are accessed. The module should not have any memory that it was called with diffe...

Hi

Replace "StatElecSolve" with "StatElecSolveVec" and you may have better success.

-Peter

Just to note: this was fixed by Fabien.

The reason for the original bug was that the application of this routine was extended beyond nodal fields. If we have other type of fields we cannot use just the parallel info related to the geometric nodes.

-Peter

Hi,

We are still working on some minor issues. I think our marketing department got a little ahead of us! But great to have the visibility even though it puts some pressure on us.

-Peter

Hi CoilSolver is merely a static current conduction solver with some special hacks that make life easier for coils, e.g. 1) You can define currents for closed coils without having to create an extra cut on it 2) You can normalize the current density automatically to have desired total current 3) You...

Hi Juris,

Great! I just committed the fix to devel.

-Peter

Hi Juris,

What if you increase the size at line 4602. E.g. to
CALL CheckBuffer( 8*TotalL + ParEnv % NumOfNeighbours*(1+MPI_BSEND_OVERHEAD) )

-Peter

Hi Eric,

What is the size of your variable?

Are you sure that your case is an UDF rather than a Solver. If you have transient history then the Solver provides some services to advance a variable forward when doing timestepping. So what would the UDF do? The answer depends on your goal.

-Peter

Hi It seems that the flags "Discontinuous Bodies" + "Save Boundaries Only" are incompatible. Probably not done used much together. If the fields are discontinous then the value on the boundary is not uniquely defined. Which side to take? Then it may actually be better to use flag...

The 27 node quad is rather seldomly used that maybe there is some inconsistency in the treatment of the boundary indexes. Should not happen. You might upload the files & procedure as a bug report here in the forum / or github issue.

-Peter