During a visit to an entertainment park, I saw the strategy used by Elmer for gluing different solvers.
Congrats to you all, it is a very elegant solution.
Search found 78 matches
- 08 May 2024, 06:14
- Forum: General
- Topic: Elmer's solution for coupling different solvers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 87
- 16 Apr 2024, 03:28
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Hello Peter, Thanks for you response. I am reading the data through SaveLine procedure and I am getting the expected results. Actually, using Element = p:2 gets close, but best results is trough increased order elements in the mesh. I haven't checked the simulation time yet. Also, considering the si...
- 10 Apr 2024, 21:30
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Thanks for the response, Mika.
About the result. Shoudn't B be defined by a linear variation and not a constant value in each element?
About the result. Shoudn't B be defined by a linear variation and not a constant value in each element?
- 09 Apr 2024, 17:03
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Hello all again, I saw that 'Quadratic Approximation' and 'Piola Transform' Keywords are not in the MagnetoDynamics2D solver. But they are changing the results considerably (Ps. I am using higher-order elements from ElmerGrid -increase) Is there a recomendation regarding these? Thanks again for your...
- 06 Apr 2024, 15:24
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element
PS. updated my Elmer and this problem with Quadratic approximation is solved.
- 05 Apr 2024, 19:22
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Also, When I use: Use Piola Transform = Logical True Quadratic Approximation = Logical True The linear system convergence is better, but it haults at the MagnetoDynamicsCalcFields. Simulation stops abruptaly. SingleSolver: Attempting to call solver: 3 SingleSolver: Solver Equation string is: calcfie...
- 05 Apr 2024, 15:04
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 517
MgDyn2D and high-order element
Hello all, I am trying to simulate 2D magnetic flux distribution using higher order elements. I am trying this because I want to simulate a induction furnace applied to thin electrical steel laminations (0.27 mm). My thinking is that second-order elements would reproduce better the induced current i...
- 29 Mar 2024, 02:13
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: CoilSolver and Massive coils
- Replies: 0
- Views: 494
CoilSolver and Massive coils
Hello all, I've been having trouble using massive coils and CoilSolver. Please find the simulation files attached here. For the mesh, there is a Salome File to create the mesh. For the CoilSolver I have simulated using Stranded coil, which works fine. And then I've tryied using a single turn Strande...
- 25 Mar 2024, 21:24
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Circuits and dynamics with full coil
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7562
Re: Circuits and dynamics with full coil
Also, when using voltage source,
Solution is trivially zero.
Solution is trivially zero.
- 25 Mar 2024, 20:55
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: Circuits and dynamics with full coil
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7562
Re: Circuits and dynamics with full coil
Same issue here.
Still nothing?
Still nothing?