Search found 253 matches

by mika
10 Apr 2024, 10:18
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: MgDyn2D and high-order element
Replies: 7
Views: 1014

Re: MgDyn2D and high-order element

Here the keywords "Quadratic Approximation" and "Use Piola Transform" relate to the 3-D solvers where the discretization is done in terms of curl-conforming (edge element) basis functions. The 2-D version uses standard basis functions and doesn't need these commands. However it m...
by mika
05 Apr 2024, 09:33
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Plane wave in the acoustics solver
Replies: 1
Views: 309

Re: Plane wave in the acoustics solver

Some comments on the BC named as "symmetry": - to obtain symmetry the normal component of the velocity should be set to be zero, together with the do-nothing (default) BC for the temperature - if a component of velocity is specified, the corresponding component of the surface traction cann...
by mika
29 Mar 2024, 13:21
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: Helmholtz BC vs. Acoustics BC
Replies: 2
Views: 999

Re: Helmholtz BC vs. Acoustics BC

Suitable BCs are explained in Section 13.2.2 of the documentation https://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/physics/elmer/doc/ElmerModelsManual.pdf as "For example, outgoing waves may be approximated by setting Z = −rho_0 c and ZT = −iω/c on the outflow boundary". That is, one has to give also an im...
by mika
04 Mar 2024, 11:49
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: UMAT and mortar BC
Replies: 6
Views: 906

Re: UMAT and mortar BC

Thanks, your changes have now been merged. I noticed a small mistake in a size specification of memory allocation. It is also fixed in the devel branch.

-- Mika
by mika
09 Feb 2024, 12:37
Forum: ElmerSolver
Topic: UMAT and mortar BC
Replies: 6
Views: 906

Re: UMAT and mortar BC

Hi,

I think you have done right code modifications to allow for a normal-tangential BC with UMAT. They might well be worth creating a pull request.

-- Mika
by mika
30 Nov 2023, 12:59
Forum: General
Topic: 1D beam modelling
Replies: 38
Views: 5580

Re: 1D beam modelling

I made a small change to the devel branch so that mass-proportional damping (Rayleigh Damping Alpha) for translational motions can now be given for the beam solver, whereas giving Rayleigh Damping Beta = ... causes a warning message.
by mika
29 Nov 2023, 18:18
Forum: General
Topic: 1D beam modelling
Replies: 38
Views: 5580

Re: 1D beam modelling

The beam solver doesn't yet understand the Rayleigh damping parameters, but adding the Rayleigh damping would be an easy modification
by mika
29 Nov 2023, 15:27
Forum: General
Topic: 1D beam modelling
Replies: 38
Views: 5580

Re: 1D beam modelling

Both these cases are free vibrations and were supposed to vibrate forever with a magnitude of the initial displacement as there was no damping First, it might be good to mention that while this is expected for an analytic solution, computational time integration methods often have numerical damping...
by mika
22 Nov 2023, 13:16
Forum: General
Topic: 1D beam modelling
Replies: 38
Views: 5580

Re: 1D beam modelling

As another test, I now checked that if the initial deflection is such that the displacement component U 2 depends linearly on the coordinate X in the absense of external loads, U 2 at the free end starts to oscillate like this end-u2.png Probably a refined mesh would be needed, so that all eigenmode...
by mika
22 Nov 2023, 11:20
Forum: General
Topic: 1D beam modelling
Replies: 38
Views: 5580

Re: 1D beam modelling

There seems to be a problem that the beam solver has not automatically set the order of time derivatives. Therefore one has needed an explicit command Time Derivative Order = 2 in the sif file. I however updated the code as https://github.com/ElmerCSC/elmerfem/commit/7fe6d9b916d272db36f02019b202aa2c...