Hi dear Elmer users!
I want to share a nonGUI case of 2D multiphase flow simulation by the means of Level Set Method. Falling water column simulated here.
Case is based on "levelset3" test. Also present post touch on a matter of following topic (Density ratio of phases 1/1000):
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1755&start=0&hilit= ... 2ca04b5969
So, solution for high density ratio was obtained by using direct umfpack solver for linear system and dense mesh, especially near the walls.
I've performed simulation on both coarse and fine mesh.
Transport properties was smoothed and assigned as in "levelset3" test by hyperbolic tangent function.
Coarse mesh:
We see, phase interface quite smeared. During simulation appears serious instabilities in pressure and velocity.
Fine mesh:
Interfase calculated more acuratly.
The case is placed at my google drive:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BycAF ... 2VlWnN3Y0k
PS: I will really appreciate in advise on improvement of performance. Calculation for fine mesh was about 3 hours. Also any comments are welcomed!
Regards, Dmitry!
Multiphase flow simulation 2D  Level Set Method
Multiphase flow simulation 2D  Level Set Method
Last edited by dmitry on 11 Jan 2017, 20:36, edited 1 time in total.

 Site Admin
 Posts: 3580
 Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
 Antispam: Yes
 Location: Espoo, Finland
 Contact:
Re: Multiphase flow simulation 2D  Level Set Method
Hi Dmitry
I think levelset method is nice when the interface is rather smooth between two rather similar substances. However, I haven't had very good experiences with liquid/air type of interfaces. If the surface tension is not very large the interface quickly becomes irregular and difficult to track. I was also lucky that Lagrangian approach have suited many of our problems so I didn't really try to exploit all the tricks of the trade.
I think one problem may be the timescales. Elmer historically solves the NavierStokes equations in a monolithic and fully generic fashion. This is nice on the elliptic regime of the equation but I would guess that the timescales in the free surface problem here dominates and therefore we end up solving the NS equation (and the levelset equation) a huge number of times. The monolithic machinery becomes unnecessary expensive in the parabolic regime where the mass matrix dominates. Codes like OpenFOAM exploit this in pressure and velocity correction schemes which are much cheaper. Hence I think you can obtain better solution with same resources using InterFOAM solver, for example, than the current Elmer version of levelset method.
I would think that the levelset solution of Elmer could be made much better but it would require evaluating critically the steps taken in the simple test cases.
Peter
I think levelset method is nice when the interface is rather smooth between two rather similar substances. However, I haven't had very good experiences with liquid/air type of interfaces. If the surface tension is not very large the interface quickly becomes irregular and difficult to track. I was also lucky that Lagrangian approach have suited many of our problems so I didn't really try to exploit all the tricks of the trade.
I think one problem may be the timescales. Elmer historically solves the NavierStokes equations in a monolithic and fully generic fashion. This is nice on the elliptic regime of the equation but I would guess that the timescales in the free surface problem here dominates and therefore we end up solving the NS equation (and the levelset equation) a huge number of times. The monolithic machinery becomes unnecessary expensive in the parabolic regime where the mass matrix dominates. Codes like OpenFOAM exploit this in pressure and velocity correction schemes which are much cheaper. Hence I think you can obtain better solution with same resources using InterFOAM solver, for example, than the current Elmer version of levelset method.
I would think that the levelset solution of Elmer could be made much better but it would require evaluating critically the steps taken in the simple test cases.
Peter
Re: Multiphase flow simulation 2D  Level Set Method
Hi, Peter! Thank you for your detailed comments!
Elmer cover some fields of my interests, but, I guess, it's inevitable to start learn OpenFOAM, if I want to deal with free surfaces effectively.
Regards, Dmitry!
Elmer cover some fields of my interests, but, I guess, it's inevitable to start learn OpenFOAM, if I want to deal with free surfaces effectively.
Regards, Dmitry!