Hi Peter,
I prepare a small example and upload it as soon as possible.
carsten
Strange Result using Diffuse Radiation Boundary Condition
Re: Strange Result using Diffuse Radiation Boundary Condition
Hi Peter,
her is the small test case for the "NaN in the first step" problem. Simply extract an run with ElmerSolver.
carsten
her is the small test case for the "NaN in the first step" problem. Simply extract an run with ElmerSolver.
carsten
Re: Strange Result using Diffuse Radiation Boundary Condition
Hi Peter,
did you have any time to take a look on the NaN example?
carsten
did you have any time to take a look on the NaN example?
carsten
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4868
- Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
- Antispam: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: Strange Result using Diffuse Radiation Boundary Condition
Sorry, too busy these last days before Xmas. I can't much promise to look it during the holiday season either. Definately NaN should never occur at the first iteration. -Peter
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4868
- Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
- Antispam: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: Strange Result using Diffuse Radiation Boundary Condition
Hi Carsten
Better late than never, I hope. I just committed a fix for the problem (rev. 6024 in the new repo).
The problem was that sometimes the visible fraction, Fsum, was a little bit larger than one. Then when at some stage you take a root of 1-Fsum the result is NaN.
-Peter
Better late than never, I hope. I just committed a fix for the problem (rev. 6024 in the new repo).
The problem was that sometimes the visible fraction, Fsum, was a little bit larger than one. Then when at some stage you take a root of 1-Fsum the result is NaN.
-Peter
Re: Strange Result using Diffuse Radiation Boundary Condition
Hi peter,
thank you very much for fixing the problem!
carsten
thank you very much for fixing the problem!
carsten