k-epsilon coupled with heat transfer
Posted: 19 Feb 2013, 18:10
Dear elmer users,
I am trying to couple the k-epsilon with the heat transfer model using a simple 2d test case.
In the test case, a fluid flows through a rectangular channel (body 1) and on one longitudinal side of this channel a reactangular heater (body 2, a body force heat source) is placed.
This is my solving strategie:
1. Solve the flow (NS/k-epsilon) for body 1 and save the result in the output file "flow.result".
2. Solve the HT for body 1 and 2 using the restart file "flow.result".
Please find attached the the test case for both steps ofthe solving strategie.
The solving strategie works fine when in step 1 only the NS equation is solved.
Coupling NS with k-epsilon the boundary between the flow channel and the heater seems to smear.
That is, flow occurs in the heater.
Elmer seems to include the heater mesh (body 2) in calculting the flow (body 1).
Using this solution to solve the HT Elmer crashes.
I changed some parameters (boundary layer thickness etc.) but had no success.
Any help or suggestions would be greatly apprciated!
Best regards
Lars
I am trying to couple the k-epsilon with the heat transfer model using a simple 2d test case.
In the test case, a fluid flows through a rectangular channel (body 1) and on one longitudinal side of this channel a reactangular heater (body 2, a body force heat source) is placed.
This is my solving strategie:
1. Solve the flow (NS/k-epsilon) for body 1 and save the result in the output file "flow.result".
2. Solve the HT for body 1 and 2 using the restart file "flow.result".
Please find attached the the test case for both steps ofthe solving strategie.
The solving strategie works fine when in step 1 only the NS equation is solved.
Coupling NS with k-epsilon the boundary between the flow channel and the heater seems to smear.
That is, flow occurs in the heater.
Elmer seems to include the heater mesh (body 2) in calculting the flow (body 1).
Using this solution to solve the HT Elmer crashes.
I changed some parameters (boundary layer thickness etc.) but had no success.
Any help or suggestions would be greatly apprciated!
Best regards
Lars