All of these threw an error trying to read that files
NETGEN error
Load 2D-Spline geometry file avion7.in2d
Load 2D Geometry V2
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
ElmeGUI error
Start 2D meshing...
Load 2D Geometry V2
load points
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
GMSH error
sytnax error
Search found 2311 matches
- Today, 18:34
- Forum: ElmerGUI
- Topic: Elmer GUI crashes when loading this .in2d
- Replies: 1
- Views: 56
- Yesterday, 18:24
- Forum: ElmerGUI
- Topic: ElmerGrid weirdness
- Replies: 2
- Views: 81
Re: ElmerGrid weirdness
They are boundary elements so if you do not target those boundaries in the sif file and impose boundary conditions on them they will be ignored by the solver. Same with bodies, if you do not create the body in the sif, a body in the mesh will be ignored.
- Yesterday, 17:25
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: electrodynamic forces on busbars
- Replies: 6
- Views: 187
Re: electrodynamic forces on busbars
This project couples magnetic force to displacement, although the magnetic field is not electrical induced
but you should be able to go from electrical field to magnetic field to mechanical force
https://github.com/mrkearden/magnet
but you should be able to go from electrical field to magnetic field to mechanical force
https://github.com/mrkearden/magnet
- Yesterday, 13:18
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: electrodynamic forces on busbars
- Replies: 6
- Views: 187
- 22 Apr 2024, 22:49
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: Random crashes while repeatedly running the same script
- Replies: 4
- Views: 97
Re: Random crashes while repeatedly running the same script
After the refining by splitting, I recombined the triangles to quads, went 2nd order, and the all of the errors went away and a solution was obtained.
- 22 Apr 2024, 21:46
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: Random crashes while repeatedly running the same script
- Replies: 4
- Views: 97
Re: Random crashes while repeatedly running the same script
I would suspect mesh quality. I downloaded the files and ran as is and I received the numerous ERROR:: ElementMetric: Degenerate errors I did a refine by split 1 time in gmsh and that error went away I then received a non-convergence error ERROR:: ComputeChange: Numerical Error: Norm of solution app...
- 22 Apr 2024, 12:51
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: SaveScalars solver in parallel
- Replies: 6
- Views: 150
Re: SaveScalars solver in parallel
If your mesh is in the current directory and your number of cores specified for the solver is the same as the number of partitions then
Mesh DB "." "."
should be ok since your mesh is in the current directory.
Mesh DB "." "."
should be ok since your mesh is in the current directory.
- 22 Apr 2024, 12:26
- Forum: General
- Topic: Coupled Fluid-Structure Eigen Analysis
- Replies: 21
- Views: 454
Re: Coupled Fluid-Structure Eigen Analysis
using the ShoboxFsiEigen2d test case with Density = 2710.0 Youngs Modulus = 70e9 Poisson Ratio = 0.3 The beam frequency should be 87 Hz in air and 55 Hz in water with $ AirDensity = 1.0 $ SoundSpeed = 300 ElmerSolver reports EigenSolveComplex: EIGEN SYSTEM SOLUTION COMPLETE: EigenSolveComplex: Eigen...
- 22 Apr 2024, 11:28
- Forum: ElmerSolver
- Topic: SaveScalars solver in parallel
- Replies: 6
- Views: 150
Re: SaveScalars solver in parallel
The mesh location is specified in the header on the line Mesh DB "." "." This is at the top of the form in ElmerGUI setup. . . meaning current directory your mesh is in the current directory Your error.txt file reports The mesh will be partitioned with Metis to 2 partitions. mean...
- 20 Apr 2024, 13:04
- Forum: General
- Topic: Coupled Fluid-Structure Eigen Analysis
- Replies: 21
- Views: 454
Re: Coupled Fluid-Structure Eigen Analysis
I went to the test cases
HelmholtStructure
HelmholtStructure2
HelmholtStructure3
and change the density from 1 to 1000, and the sound speed from 300 to 1443.
In each one there was no difference in the structural result, but the pressure calculation changed.
HelmholtStructure
HelmholtStructure2
HelmholtStructure3
and change the density from 1 to 1000, and the sound speed from 300 to 1443.
In each one there was no difference in the structural result, but the pressure calculation changed.