i_component as argument for MATC function

Numerical methods and mathematical models of Elmer
MartinHoeijmakers
Posts: 23
Joined: 22 Oct 2017, 21:03
Antispam: Yes

Re: i_component as argument for MATC function

Post by MartinHoeijmakers »

Sorry Peter,

I didn't read the second part of you message. I think the easiest way is to use the component, because in SaveScalars, you also seen names such as i_component(1). But that is perhaps also because you define the names like that? In all examples, you see i_component(1).

Kind regards,
Martin
raback
Site Admin
Posts: 4243
Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 11:57
Antispam: Yes
Location: Espoo, Finland
Contact:

Re: i_component as argument for MATC function

Post by raback »

Hi

Yes, there is nothing fixed. Everything is as we define ;-) Nevertheless, we honor backward compatibility and hence I think I will make some alterations to follow more closely the "component" convention. You're probably still the only user so the change can still be made...

-Peter
Post Reply